Loading...

The Truth About Worn Tires

Most drivers today base their tire purchase decisions on factors like cost and mileage warranty. If they do any research on performance, the majority of reviews and ratings available focus on how new tires perform. That's a problem.

What Consumers Should Know About Premium Tires

  1. Safe & Cost
    Effective
    It is safer and more budget friendly to choose a good-quality tire and use it until the wear limit than to choose a budget tire and replace it early.
  2. Better
    Braking
    A worn premium tire can brake better on a wet surface than some brand-new tires.
  3. Tested &
    true
    The performance of a new tire doesn't necessarily indicate how it will perform when it's worn. That's why Michelin advocates testing worn tires.
Brand A WORN Performance

All tires are NOT equal over time

Tire Performance Changes

As early as the first mile driven off the dealer's lot, tires begin to wear. How quickly a tire's stopping ability and other performance indicators change depends on driver behavior, road conditions, weather conditions, vehicle make and model, mileage, the type and quality of the tire, and many other factors.

Michelin believes that consumers should be armed with the right information about how their tires will perform over time.

Currently, the industry standard is to test performance of new tires; however, those attributes can change drastically as tires wear over time. That means consumers make purchase decisions based on factors that become less and less relevant the more they driver on the tires.

Michelin is taking steps to close this gap. Though safety may be subjective from one driver to another, braking distance (especially wet braking) is recognized worldwide as the best indicator of safety in the automotive and tire industry.

Results show that braking performances among new tires are not equal—and Michelin's internal tests show that worn tires can be even more unequal in their braking performances.

Tire Wear Comparison
Tires Wear Down.
Braking performance should not.
Tire design features can change drastically as the tire wears.
Stopping Distance Comparison
Brand A (New)
Braking distance: 87 ft.
Brand B (New)
Braking distance: 118 ft.
Brand A (Worn)
Braking distance: 107 ft.
Brand B (Worn)
Braking distance: 165 ft.
TEST ON: 2017 Toyota Camry, 215/55R17 94V, LPG A9 Wet, 5/11/2017.

If all new tires are not equal, worn tires are even harder to compare.

Michelin conducted internal tests that compared braking distances among specific tires in new and worn conditions to reveal how safety performance changes over time. The "worn" tires were buffed to the tread wear indicator, near the end of the tire's useful life (at 2/32-inch, as defined in many states).

The test results are dramatic. Some worn tires deliver wet-braking distances that are about the same or better than other new tires. In fact, there was a 78-foot difference in stopping distance, more than five car lengths, between the best and worst tire in the test.

Click to play video

Lack of Awareness Has Larger Impacts

Long-last performance—which Michelin defines as making tires designed to deliver industry-leading performances throughout the life of the tire—is a critical issue for consumers. Consumer lack of understanding of long-lasting performance is not just a safety issue. It can harm the environment and the wallet, too.

Research from EY and other industry sources shows that early removal of tires from cars wastes about 400 million tires per year worldwide. It's costly, too—forcing the average driver to buy the equivalent of one additional new tire every two years. In fact, removing tires prematurely costs drivers more than $25 billion globally, accounting for increased fuel consumption and unnecessary tire purchases.

Wasted Tires
400 million wasted tires/year go to landfill EY Report – Planned obsolescence is not inevitable, May 2017, an Ernst & Young report commissioned by Michelin
Dollars Wasted
25 billion dollars wasted EY Report - Planned obsolescence is not inevitable, May 2017, an Ernst & Young report commissioned by Michelin
Cost Every Two Years
$250 cost for drivers every two years Assumes that well-maintained tires last roughly 60,000 miles with 8/32nds of usable tread depth. If replaced at 2/32 instead of 4/32, each tire would yield 20,000 miles more.
Increase in Tire Cost
40% increase in tire cost for same number of miles traveled EY Report - Planned obsolescence is not inevitable, May 2017, an Ernst & Young report commissioned by Michelin

What do we need to do next?

The need to educate consumers about long-last performance as a factor in both tire purchase and maintenance is a new concept for the industry. As a company that thinks long term about sustainable mobility, Michelin is starting a discussion about performance standards for worn tires, working with dealers and other industry stakeholders. Consumers should have access to this critical information and Michelin is working to raise consumer awareness and understanding of this important safety, performance and environmental issue.

Need the assets?

You may download images individually or use the checkboxes to select multiple images to download several at once.

Download All Image Assets
Download Selected
© 2018 Michelin North America, Inc., All rights reserved. 1 Parkway S. Greenville SC 29615 USA